theklaus Postado 22 de fevereiro de 2005 Postado 22 de fevereiro de 2005 vai abaixo um estudo recente publicado nos EUA. Creatine supplementation and exercise performance : recent findings. Bemben MG, Lamont HS. Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Department of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA. Creatine monohydrate (Cr) is perhaps one of the most widely used supplements taken in an attempt to improve athletic performance. The aim of this review is to update, summarise and evaluate the findings associated with Cr ingestion and sport and exercise performance with the most recent research available. Because of the large volume of scientific literature dealing with Cr supplementation and the recent efforts to delineate sport-specific effects, this paper focuses on research articles that have been published since 1999.Cr is produced endogenously by the liver or ingested from exogenous sources such as meat and fish. Almost all the Cr in the body is located in skeletal muscle in either the free (Cr: ~40%) or phosphorylated (PCr: ~60%) form and represents an average Cr pool of about 120-140g for an average 70kg person.It is hypothesised that Cr can act though a number of possible mechanisms as a potential ergogenic aid but it appears to be most effective for activities that involve repeated short bouts of high-intensity physical activity. Additionally, investigators have studied a number of different Cr loading programmes; the most common programme involves an initial loading phase of 20 g/day for 5-7 days, followed by a maintenance phase of 3-5 g/day for differing periods of time (1 week to 6 months). When maximal force or strength (dynamic or isotonic contractions) is the outcome measure following Cr ingestion, it generally appears that Cr does significantly impact force production regardless of sport, sex or age. The evidence is much more equivocal when investigating isokinetic force production and little evidence exists to support the use of Cr for isometric muscular performance. There is little benefit from Cr ingestion for the prevention or suppression of muscle damage or soreness following muscular activity.When performance is assessed based on intensity and duration of the exercises, there is contradictory evidence relative to both continuous and intermittent endurance activities. However, activities that involve jumping, sprinting or cycling generally show improved sport performance following Cr ingestion. With these concepts in mind, the focus of this paper is to summarise the effectiveness of Cr on specific performance outcomes rather than on proposed mechanisms of action.The last brief section of this review deals with the potential adverse effects of Cr supplementation. There appears to be no strong scientific evidence to support any adverse effects but it should be noted that there have been no studies to date that address the issue of long-term Cr usage. PMID: 15707376 [PubMed - in process] quem nao souber ingles, como eu, traduz no google/ferramentas de idiomas.
theklaus Postado 22 de fevereiro de 2005 Postado 22 de fevereiro de 2005 aqui um estudo q mostra um realce da espessura do musculo apos 6 semanas de uso de creatina ingerida APOS os exercicios fisicos: Effect of creatine ingestion after exercise on muscle thickness in males and females. Chilibeck PD, Stride D, Farthing JP, Burke DG. College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. phil.chilibeck@usask.ca Muscles exercised before creatine (Cr) supplementation have a greater elevation of intramuscular Cr than nonexercised muscles. PURPOSE: To determine whether preferential increase of muscle thickness could be achieved by ingesting Cr immediately after exercise of specific muscles over 6 wk. Another purpose was to determine if the increase in lean tissue mass (LTM) with Cr supplementation is greater in males than females. METHODS: Subjects randomly assigned to Cr (six males, five females, 0.2 g Cr x kg(-1)) and placebo (PL; five males, five females) performed single-limb training with one side of the body two times per week and with the opposite limbs two times per week. Cr was consumed after training of one side of the body and PL after training the opposite side. Subjects on PL always consumed PL after exercise. Elbow flexors and knee extensors muscle thickness, LTM, fat, and bone mass, and single-limb bench and leg press one-repetition maximum (1-RM) were assessed before and after 6 wk. RESULTS: Within the Cr group, elbow flexors muscle thickness increased more in the limbs trained on days Cr was supplemented compared with limbs trained on days PL was supplemented (P < 0.02). All other measures changed to a similar extent between limbs. Males on Cr had the greatest increase in LTM (P < 0.05) with no difference between females on Cr and PL. Bench press 1-RM increased more in Cr than PL groups (P < 0.01). All other measures changed to a similar extent between groups. Males increased bone mass (P < 0.01) with no effect of Cr supplementation. CONCLUSION: Supplementing with Cr after training of the arms resulted in greater increase in muscle thickness of the arms. Males have a greater increase in LTM with Cr supplementation than females. Publication Types: * Clinical Trial * Randomized Controlled Trial PMID: 15595301 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Marquinhus_Maromba Postado 23 de fevereiro de 2005 Postado 23 de fevereiro de 2005 Cada um fala uma coisa... Mas é isso ae...tem q tomar de forma q de resultado pra cada um não adianta inventar até vir estudos verídicos q comprovem o "certo"
slimshady-bh1338434217 Postado 28 de fevereiro de 2005 Postado 28 de fevereiro de 2005 enfim, faz diferença saturar ou nao???
Post Destacado
Crie uma conta ou entre para comentar
Você precisar ser um membro para fazer um comentário
Criar uma conta
Crie uma conta 100% gratuita!
Crie uma nova contaEntrar
Já tem uma conta? Faça o login.
Entrar agora